United States v. Luis Montoya-Ramirez

Good Law
473 F. App'x 732
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 201211-30158California328 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Luis Montoya-Ramirez appeals the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

We review the district court’s interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo, and its application of the Guidelines for abuse of discretion. United States v. Rising Sun, 522 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir. 2008).

The district court did not engage in impermissible-double counting when it calculated Montoya-Ramirez’s criminal history score. A sentence imposed for a probation revocation is counted separately from a sentence for a new criminal conviction imposed at the same time. U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2; United States v. Palmer, 946 F.2d 97, 99 (9th Cir.1991). Therefore, the district court did not err when it assigned three criminal history points for the sentence resulting from the revocation of probation on Montoya-Ramirez’s prior burglary conviction, and an additional two points for the sentence on the DUI conviction that led to the revocation.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by failing to grant Montoya-Ramirez’s request for a 12-month…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.