Carrillo-Lozano

Carrillo-Lozano v. Holder

Good Law
478 F. App'x 395
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 201207-73779, 08-70147, 09-17802California640 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Alfredo Carrillo-Lozano (“Carrillo”) petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying termination based on his citizenship claim. The BIA found that Carrillo failed to establish citizenship through his mother and that the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) met its burden of proof on the alienage issue. Carrillo additionally petitions for review of the BIA’s denial of his motion to reconsider. The two previous petitions were consolidated and transferred to the District Court for the District of Arizona for a determination of Carrillo’s citizenship claim. Carrillo now seeks review of the district court’s determination that he is not a United States citizen. Lastly, Carrillo seeks review of the district court’s denial of his habeas petition challenging his detention. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petitions and affirm the district court’s determination that Carrillo is not a United States citizen.

1. The district court did not abuse its discretion in appointing an expert in Mexican family law, under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44.1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.