Tong Xiong v. Tom Felker

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 5, 201209-16830California6,551 words

Opinion

Opinion

M. SMITH, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TONG XIONG, 

Petitioner-Appellant, No. 09-16830 v. D.C. No. TOM FELKER, Warden; ATTORNEY  2:07-cv-02689-

GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF JAM-CHS

CALIFORNIA, OPINION

Respondents-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 12, 2012* San Francisco, California

Filed June 5, 2012

Before: John T. Noonan, M. Margaret McKeown, and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judge; Dissent by Judge Noonan

*The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

6251 6254 XIONG v. FELKER

COUNSEL

Stephanie M. Adraktas, Berkeley, California, for the petitioner-appellant.

Kamala D. Harris, Michael P. Farrell, Tami M. Krenzin, Ken- neth N. Sokoler, California Department of Justice, Sacra- mento, California, for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.