Cdcr

Davis v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

Good Law
484 F. App'x 124
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 6, 201210-17890California2,446 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Plaintiffs Brenda Davis and David Roy, individuals formerly employed as social workers on a contract basis at the Pelican Bay facility of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment on their claims of retaliation against CDCR. Davis also appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment against her on her claims of employment discrimination on the basis of gender by the CDCR, and former supervisors David Mande! and Timothy McCarthy, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) and on her similar cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 for violations of the Equal Protection Clause. She also appeals the grant of summary judgment for the defendants on her claims of sexual harassment under Title VII, Equal Protection and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”).

We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment. Range Rd. Music, Inc. v. E. Coast Foods, Inc., 668 F.3d 1148, 1152 (9th Cir.2012). “Summary judgment is appropriate when, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and drawing all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.