Hernandez-Morales

Hernandez-Morales v. Holder

Good Law
473 F. App'x 771
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 8, 201207-72198California328 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

1. The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) did not err in finding that Hernandez was statutorily ineligible for an adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255 . Because Hernandez entered the United States illegally, he does not meet the requirement of § 1255(a) that an alien be “inspected and admitted or paroled” into the country. Hernandez does not otherwise qualify as having been “grandfathered” into the statute. See 8 C.F.R. § 1245.10 ; Landin-Molina v. Holder, 580 F.3d 913, 915-17 (9th Cir.2009).

2. Hernandez was also not eligible for nunc pro tunc permission to reapply for admission. Because Hernandez illegally returned to the United States and remained in the country after having been deported, the BIA properly concluded that he was among a class of “illegal entrants” who were “inadmissible for being present without admission or parole.” 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(6)(A).

3. The BIA did not err in finding Hernandez had failed to establish extraordinary circumstances excusing his untimely filing as required by 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (a)(2)(D). The failure of the border officials to refer him to an asylum officer or immigration judge in 2007, two years before his most recent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.