Cgi Technologies and Solutions v. Rhonda Rose

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 20, 201211-35127California6,758 words

Opinion

Opinion

GOULD, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CGI TECHNOLOGIES AND SOLUTIONS 

INC, in its capacity as sponsor and fiduciary for CGI Technologies and Solutions, Inc Welfare Benefit Plan, No. 11-35127 Plaintiff-Appellee,  D.C. No. v. 2:10-cv-00298-RSM

RHONDA ROSE; NELSON LANGER

ENGLE PLLC,

Defendants-Appellants. 

CGI TECHNOLOGIES AND SOLUTIONS 

INC, in its capacity as sponsor and fiduciary for CGI Technologies and Solutions, Inc Welfare Benefit No. 11-35128 Plan, Plaintiff-Appellant,  D.C. No. 2:10-cv-00298-RSM v. OPINION

RHONDA ROSE; NELSON LANGER

ENGLE PLLC,

Defendants-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 9, 2012—Seattle, Washington

Filed June 20, 2012

7219 7220 CGI TECHNOLOGIES AND SOLUTIONS v. ROSE Before: Mary M. Schroeder and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges, and Ralph R. Beistline, Chief District Judge.*

Opinion by Judge Gould; Concurrence by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.