Janet Mays v. Qwest Corporation

Good Law
473 F. App'x 813
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 201211-15556California261 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Plaintiff-appellant Janet Mays appeals from the judgment entered following the district court’s grant of a motion for summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Qwest Corporation. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recite them further except as neces sary to explain our decision. We have jurisdiction over this matter under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Mays did not establish a prima facie case of employment discrimination as required under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973). Mays failed to show the existence of a genuine issue of material fact that she was qualified for the Lee Circle fiber splicing position in 2007 because the uncontroverted evidence showed that she did not request a transfer to fiber splicing at Lee Circle on her LMR form at that time.

Supposing she made out a prima facie case under McDonnell Douglas, Mays’ claim further fails for the independent reason that she has failed to create a triable issue of material fact as to pretext. 411 U.S. at 804 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 .

Finally, since Mays was transferred to Lee Circle as soon as she was eligible after filing a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.