Rene Lopez Rodriguez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Good Law
683 F.3d 1164·2012 WL 2401984
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 27, 201208-71481, 08-73353California6,378 words

Opinion

Opinion

Paez, J.

The Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA or Board) governing regulations limit its scope of review of an immigration judge’s (IJ) factual findings. Under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1 (d)(3)(i), (iv), the BIA may only review findings of fact for clear error, and is prohibited from making its own factual determinations. In this petition for review, which arises in the context of allegations of drug smuggling, we consider whether the Board exceeded these limitations when it reversed the IJ’s determination that petitioner Rene Lopez-Rodriguez was admissible and concluded instead that Lopez-Rodriguez was inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(2)(C). Because we conclude that the Board committed legal error by making its own factual determination and engaging in de novo review of the IJ’s factual findings, we grant the petition and remand for further proceedings.

I.

Rene Lopez-Rodriguez is a native and citizen of Mexico. In 2006, he was working as a “runner” or supplier for ships in Puerto Peñasco, Sonora, a fishing and resort town located on the Gulf of California. He had been working for the same employer for two years. His employer would regularly send him to a particular store in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.