Sawyers

Sawyers v. Mukasey

Bad Law
684 F.3d 911·2012 WL 2507513·2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13338
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 201208-70181California325 words

Opinion

Opinion

Petitioner Damien Antonio Sawyers petitions for review from the Board of Immi gration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a). The BIA held that Petitioner could not demonstrate that he met the seven-year continuous residence requirement, id. § 1229b(a)(2). In our original decision, we followed Cuevas-Gaspar v. Gonzales, 430 F.3d 1013 (9th Cir.2005), and Mercado-Zazueta v. Holder, 580 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir.2009), to hold that the years of residence of Petitioner’s mother were imputed to him. Sawyers v. Holder, 399 Fed.Appx. 313 (9th Cir.2010) (unpublished decision). We therefore granted the petition. Id. at 314 . The Supreme Court granted certiorari, Holder v. Sawyers, -U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 71 , 180 L.Ed.2d 939 (2011), and reversed our decision, Holder v. Martinez Gutierrez, —U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 2011 , 182 L.Ed.2d 922 (2012). Because Cuevas-Gaspar and Mercado-Zazueta are no longer valid precedent on the issue of imputation under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b, we now reject Petitioner’s imputation argument concerning his mother’s residence.

In the alternative, Petitioner challenges the BIA’s determination that his 2002 conviction terminated his continuous…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.