United States v. Jamar Belin

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 201211-10543California205 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 29 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10543

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:03-cr-00350-LRH

v.

MEMORANDUM *

JAMAR BELIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 26, 2012 **

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Jamar Belin appeals from the eight-month sentence imposed upon

revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Belin contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because his

supervised release violations were technical and he had shown improvement with

his drug abuse. In light of the totality of the circumstances…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.