United States v. Jamar Belin
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 201211-10543California205 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 29 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10543
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:03-cr-00350-LRH
v.
MEMORANDUM *
JAMAR BELIN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 26, 2012 **
Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
Jamar Belin appeals from the eight-month sentence imposed upon
revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,
and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Belin contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because his
supervised release violations were technical and he had shown improvement with
his drug abuse. In light of the totality of the circumstances…