Tristan Pablo-Rivera v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
479 F. App'x 756
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 5, 201209-71880California277 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Tristan Carl Pablo-Rivera, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo questions of law, Ngaeth v. Mukasey, 545 F.3d 796, 800 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA correctly determined that Pablo-Rivera’s convictions under California Penal Code § 459 are aggravated felony attempted theft offenses where the record of conviction establishes that Pablo-Rivera pled guilty on both occasions to entering a locked vehicle with the intent to commit theft. See id. at 802 (“[A] conviction for entering a locked vehicle with the intent to commit theft constitutes an attempted theft offense for purposes of the aggravated felony definition.”); see also Ramirez-Villalpando v. Holder, 645 F.3d 1035, 1040-41 (9th Cir.2011) (using an abstract of judgment in combination with a charging document to establish removability). In light of this determination, the BIA correctly concluded that Pablo-Rivera is removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(2)(A)(iii), and is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.