Beeman
Beeman v. Anthem Prescription
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 10, 201207-56692California377 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JERRY BEEMAN AND PHARMACY
SERVICES, INC., doing business as Beemans Pharmacy; ANTHONY
HUTCHINSON AND ROCIDA INC.,
doing business as Finleys Rexall Drug; CHARLES MILLER, doing business as Yucaipai Valley Pharmacy; JIM MORISOLI AND
AMERICAN SURGICAL PHARMACY
INC., doing business as American Surgical Pharmacy; BILL PEARSON AND PEARSON AND HOUSE, on behalf of themselves and all others No. 07-56692 similarly situated and on behalf of D.C. No. the general public; doing business as Pearson Medical Group CV-04-00407-VAP Central District of Pharmacy, California, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Riverside v.
ANTHEM PRESCRIPTION
MANAGEMENT, LLC; ARGUS HEALTH
SYSTEMS, INC.; BENESCRIPT
SERVICES, INC.; FFI RX MANAGED
CARE; FIRST HEALTH SERVICES
CORPORATION; MANAGED PHARMACY
BENEFITS, INC., formerly known as Cardinal Health MPB Inc.;
NATIONAL MEDICAL HEALTH CARD
SYSTEMS, INC.; PHARMACARE
MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.;
7921 7922 BEEMAN v. ANTHEM PRESCRIPTION MANAGEMENT