Beeman

Beeman v. Anthem Prescription

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 10, 201207-56692California377 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JERRY BEEMAN AND PHARMACY 

SERVICES, INC., doing business as Beemans Pharmacy; ANTHONY

HUTCHINSON AND ROCIDA INC.,

doing business as Finleys Rexall Drug; CHARLES MILLER, doing business as Yucaipai Valley Pharmacy; JIM MORISOLI AND

AMERICAN SURGICAL PHARMACY

INC., doing business as American Surgical Pharmacy; BILL PEARSON AND PEARSON AND HOUSE, on behalf of themselves and all others No. 07-56692 similarly situated and on behalf of D.C. No. the general public; doing business as Pearson Medical Group  CV-04-00407-VAP Central District of Pharmacy, California, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Riverside v.

ANTHEM PRESCRIPTION

MANAGEMENT, LLC; ARGUS HEALTH

SYSTEMS, INC.; BENESCRIPT

SERVICES, INC.; FFI RX MANAGED

CARE; FIRST HEALTH SERVICES

CORPORATION; MANAGED PHARMACY

BENEFITS, INC., formerly known as Cardinal Health MPB Inc.;

NATIONAL MEDICAL HEALTH CARD

SYSTEMS, INC.; PHARMACARE

MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.;

7921 7922 BEEMAN v. ANTHEM PRESCRIPTION MANAGEMENT

PRIME THERAPEUTICS; RESTAT 

CORPORATION; RX SOLUTIONS, INC.;

TMESYS, INC.; WHP…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.