Css

Shavin v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Good Law
488 F. App'x 223
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 11, 201210-17254California723 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Alan Shavin brought an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) to obtain judicial review of the final determination of the Social Security Commissioner denying his claim for disability benefits. Shavin filed an application for disability insurance benefits, claiming that he was disabled because of cervical degenerative disc disease and spinal stenosis. The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) issued a final order denying the application, finding that Sha-vin was not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act because he was capable of performing his past work. After the Appeals Council denied review, the district court affirmed the denial of benefits. Shavin appeals to this court. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we reverse.

Shavin claims that the ALJ committed legal error because he failed to give the opinion of treating physician Dr. Rappo-port controlling weight and instead incorrectly relied on the report of Dr. McPhee, a consulting physician. We agree. To reject the opinion of treating physician Dr. Rappoport, the ALJ must give “specific and legitimate reasons” for doing so, such as noting legitimate inconsistencies and ambiguities in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.