Gail Michelman v. Lincoln National Life Insuranc

Good Law
685 F.3d 887·2012 WL 2855815·82 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1326·2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 14266
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 12, 201211-35393California7,374 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gee, J.

We are asked to decide whether an adverse claim to a stake may be so lacking in substance that a neutral stakeholder cannot interplead in good faith. Interpleader is proper when a stakeholder has at least a good faith belief that there are conflicting colorable claims. We conclude that Appellee met this requirement.

I. BACKGROUND

Gail and Irwin Michelman submitted a life insurance application to Lincoln National Life Insurance Company in 1999 to obtain coverage for their minor daughter, Elizabeth. At the time, Gail and Irwin were married. The application listed Gail and Irwin as the primary beneficiaries and their other daughter, Jessica, as a contingent beneficiary. The application designated Gail as the policy owner, with policy ownership passing to Elizabeth upon her 21st birthday. Lincoln subsequently issued the policy memorializing this.

Whether Irwin also had an ownership interest in Elizabeth’s life insurance policy is less certain. The insurance contract unhelpfully defined the policy “Owner” — in the singular — as “the Owner identified in the application or a successor.” Although Irwin’s name was written on the line of the application designated for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.