Maria Bucio Escobedo v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Good Law
474 F. App'x 630
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 19, 201208-73582California242 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Maria D. Bucio Escobedo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for re view of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of her application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petition for review.

Escobedo’s contention that the Board’s summary affirmance of the immigration judge’s decision violated her due process rights is foreclosed by Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 849-52 (9th Cir.2003).

Substantial evidence supports the immigration judge’s determination that Escobe-do did not meet the continuous physical presence requirement, because her testimony established that she left the United States for more than 90 days from 1998 to 1999, thereby interrupting the accrual of continuous physical presence in the United States. See Gutierrez v. Mukasey, 521 F.3d 1114, 1117 (9th Cir.2008) (acknowledging that service of the notice to appear halts the accrual of continuous physical presence). Because Escobedo’s inability to establish physical presence was disposi-tive, any evidence supporting the other elements of cancellation would not have changed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.