Orantes-Barrera

Orantes-Barrera v. Holder

Good Law
474 F. App'x 627
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 19, 201208-70322California450 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Norma Yamillett Orantes-Barrera, a native and citizen of El Salvador, peti tions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming an immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for substantial evidence, see Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir.2010), we deny the petition for review.

1. Contrary to Orantes-Barrera’s contentions, the IJ made an explicit adverse credibility finding. See de Leon-Barrios v. INS, 116 F.3d 391 , 394 (9th Cir.1997) (stating that although an adverse credibility finding does not require the recitation of unique or particular words, it must be explicit). Here, the IJ stated that he believed Orantes-Barrera with regard to the fact that there are gangs prevalent in El Salvador but “[could ] not find ... credible” “the other aspects where she attempts to elevate or lift her claim to a protected basis, and on account of a protected ground.”

2. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility finding. See Shrestha, 590 F.3d at 1039 . The IJ…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.