United States v. Miguel Tzunux-Ruiz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 201211-10361California242 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 20 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10361

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:10-cr-00016-RCC

v.

MEMORANDUM *

MIGUEL TZUNUX-RUIZ, a.k.a. Miguel Tomas-Santos,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 17, 2012 **

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Miguel Tzunux-Ruiz appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 70-month

sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Tzunux-Ruiz’s counsel has filed a brief

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel

of record.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.