Virgilio Guerra-Molina v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
474 F. App'x 669
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 201210-71162California258 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Virgilio Guerra-Molina, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence. Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1244 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that even if Guerra-Molina established past persecution, the government rebutted the presumption of a well-founded fear of future persecution with evidence he could reasonably relocate within Guatemala to avoid harm. See Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 995, 1000 (9th Cir.2003) (presumption of well-founded fear can be rebutted if the government can show the applicant could reasonably be expected to relocate). Accordingly, Guerra-Molina’s asylum claim fails.

Because Guerra-Molina failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.