Owcp

Pacific Ship Repair & Fabrication Inc. v. Director, Office of Worker Compensation Programs

Good Law
687 F.3d 1182·2012 WL 3004717·2012 A.M.C. 2184·2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 15223
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 24, 201211-70292California2,426 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKEOWN, J.

The meaning of “permanent” appears, at first blush, to be clear. But just as a museum’s permanent collection does not mean the works will stay in the collection for posterity and a permanent hair wave does not last a lifetime, neither does the term permanent necessarily mean forever. The word permanent takes on meaning in context and, in this case, within a statutory framework.

In the context of maritime employment, we consider an issue of first impression in this circuit: whether a partial “permanent” disability may be re-characterized as “temporary” during a period of recuperation. The label we affix does not affect whether the disabled employee is entitled to disability benefits; instead, it determines who pays the benefits — either the employer or the special workers’ compensation fund. We affirm the decision of the Department of Labor’s Benefits Review Board (the “Board”) that an employee who has a permanent partial disability may be reclassified as temporarily totally disabled during a recovery period following surgery.

Background

Deborah Benge, a former employee of Pacific Ship Repair and Fabrication Inc. (“Pacific”), suffered neck and back injuries while…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.