Martinez

Martinez v. Holder

Good Law
474 F. App'x 720
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 25, 201207-73875California263 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Max Eddy Martinez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo questions of law, Camins v. Gonzales, 500 F.3d 872, 876 (9th Cir.2007), and we grant the petition for review -and remand for further proceedings.

In concluding that Martinez was seeking admission to the United States, and was therefore subject to charges of inadmissibility, the agency did not have the benefit of Vartelas v. Holder, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 1479, 1483-84, 1490-92 , 182 L.Ed.2d 473 (2012), in which the Supreme Court held that 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(13)(C)(v) does not apply to criminal convictions that predate the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-208 (“IIRIRA”). Additionally, in concluding that Martinez was ineligible for a waiver of inadmissibility under former § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, the agency did not have the benefit of Peng v. Holder, 673 F.3d 1248, 1256-57 (9th Cir.2012), where we held that § 212(c) relief remains available…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.