California Communities Against Toxics v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Good Law
688 F.3d 989·2012 WL 3038520·74 ERC (BNA) 2121·2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 15428
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 201211-71127California1,630 words

Opinion

Opinion

Two environmental groups petition for review of a final rulemaking by the EPA. The groups and the EPA agree this case should be remanded, so the only dispute is whether vacatur is appropriate.

Background

The Clean Air Act requires the EPA to set national ambient air quality standards for air pollutants. 42 U.S.C. § 7409 . States are responsible for developing plans to implement those standards. § 7410(a)(1). The states’ plans, and any revisions, must be approved by the EPA. § 7410(k). As part of the plans, states must establish a permitting program for new polluters in areas that don’t meet the EPA’s standards. §§ 7502(c)(5), 7503(c). Those programs must ensure any emission increases be offset by corresponding emission reductions. § 7503(c).

The South Coast Air Quality Management District (“the District”) regulates the air quality in the South Coast Air Basin and the Riverside portions of the Saltón Sea Air Basin. Cal. Health & Safety Code § 40412 ; Cal.Code Regs. tit. 17, §§ 60104, 60114. Because these areas don’t meet the EPA’s air quality standards, the District is responsible for developing a plan that ensures new emission increases are offset by reductions. See 40…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.