Steven Walker v. J.W. Haviland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 201211-17233California276 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 26 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID RADEMAKER, No. 11-17223

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 5:10-cv-01659-LHK

v.

MEMORANDUM *

ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Lucy Koh, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 17, 2012 **

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

David Rademaker, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that

prison officials acted with deliberate indifference to his safety in violation of the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Eighth Amendment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo. Toguchi v. Chung,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.