Steven Walker v. J.W. Haviland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 201211-17233California276 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 26 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAVID RADEMAKER, No. 11-17223
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 5:10-cv-01659-LHK
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Lucy Koh, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 17, 2012 **
Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
David Rademaker, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the
district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that
prison officials acted with deliberate indifference to his safety in violation of the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Eighth Amendment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de
novo. Toguchi v. Chung,…