Zhong Li v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
475 F. App'x 188
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 27, 201209-73007California413 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Rebatí Mohan Datta, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the new standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the Real ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir.2010), and we review de novo claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings, Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1011 (9th Cir.2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

We do not consider the new documentary evidence Datta submitted because our review is limited to the administrative record underlying the IJ’s decision. See Fisher v. INS, 79 F.3d 955, 963 (9th Cir.1996) (en banc).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on inconsistencies between Datta’s declaration and testimony regarding whether he knew his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.