United States v. Eddie Shelby
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 27 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-10419
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:05-CR-00222-RCJ
v.
MEMORANDUM *
EDDIE SHELBY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Robert Clive Jones, Chief Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 17, 2012 **
Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Eddie Shelby appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. We have jurisdiction under
U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Shelby contends that the district court abused its discretion by declining to
reduce his sentence based on the retroactive amendments to the Sentencing