United States v. Edgar Hunter

Good Law
475 F. App'x 199
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 27, 201208-10361California341 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 27 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-10361

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:95-cr-00131-SMM

v.

MEMORANDUM *

EDGAR HUNTER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Stephen M. McNamee, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 17, 2012 **

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Edgar Hunter appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Hunter contends that the district court abused its discretion by declining to

reduce his sentence based on the retroactive amendments to the Sentencing

Guidelines that lowered the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.