United States v. Daniel McCoy

Good Law
495 F. App'x 774
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 30, 201211-10204California814 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Daniel Lawrence McCoy appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute and for felon in possession of a firearm. See 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(iii); 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1). We affirm in part and vacate and remand in part.

(1) The district court did not err when, based on the evidence in the record, it was persuaded that the officer had probable cause to stop McCoy’s automobile for a brake light violation.

(2) The prosecutor sought and obtained a superseding indictment before trial, though after McCoy filed a motion to suppress evidence. The superseding indictment added the charge of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base on February 3, 2009, to the already charged offense relating to a February 28, 2009, incident. The mere adding of the new charge at that stage of the proceedings did not give rise to an appearance of vindictiveness. See United States v. Kent, 649 F.3d 906 , 912-13 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 355 , 181 L.Ed.2d 224 (2011); United States v. Gamez-Orduno, 235 F.3d 453, 463 (9th Cir.2000); United States v. Noushfar, 78 F.3d 1442, 1446 (9th Cir. 1996). Nor was vindictiveness…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.