United States v. Michael Backlund

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 31, 201210-30264California7,884 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fisher 8568 UNITED STATES v. BACKLUND, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 10-30264 v.  D.C. No. 3:09-cr-00477-

MICHAEL BACKLUND, MO-

Defendant-Appellant. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 10-30289 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:09-cr-00479-

DAVID D. EVERIST, MO-

Defendant-Appellant. ORDER  AMENDING

OPINION AND

DENYING

PETITION FOR

PANEL

REHEARING AND

AMENDED

 OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 15, 2011—Portland, Oregon

Filed April 26, 2012 Amended July 31, 2012

8565 8566 UNITED STATES v. BACKLUND Before: Raymond C. Fisher, Richard A. Paez and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Fisher 8568 UNITED STATES v. BACKLUND

COUNSEL

James L. Buchal, Murphy & Buchal LLP, Portland, Oregon, for appellant Michael Backlund. UNITED STATES v. BACKLUND 8569 Steven J. Sherlag,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.