United States v. Marcel King

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 1, 201211-10182California352 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 11-10182 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  3:10-cr-00455-

MARCEL DARON KING, WHA-

Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 20, 2012* San Francisco, California

Filed August 1, 2012

Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Harry Pregerson, Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Sidney R. Thomas, William A. Fletcher, Richard A. Paez, Marsha S. Berzon, Richard R. Clifton, Consuelo M. Callahan, Sandra S. Ikuta and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion

*The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 35; 9th Cir. R. 35-1 to 35-3 advisory committee’s note.

8537 8538 UNITED STATES v. KING ‡

COUNSEL

Barry J. Portman, Federal Public Defender, Daniel P. Blank, Assistant Federal Pubic Defender, San Francisco, California, for the appellant.

Melinda Haag, United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.