Debbra Hill v. Michael Astrue

Good Law
688 F.3d 1144·2012 WL 3185576·2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 16372
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 7, 201210-35879California3,683 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pregerson, J.

On December 7, 2006, Debbra Jo Hill (“Hill”) filed for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Hill alleged disability beginning April 4, 2004. Hill claims that she is disabled due to unstable diabetes, eyesight problems, bipolar disorder, anxiety, depression, a back injury, a right shoulder injury, a history of two small strokes, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, a seizure disorder, and unpredictable euphoria.

The Social Security Administration denied Hill’s application, and denied it again after reconsideration. On September 24, 2008, Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Lloyd E. Hartford held a video hearing. Hill was represented by counsel and testified at the hearing, along with Dr. Monty Kuka, Ph.D., a non-examining medical expert, and James Fortune, a vocational expert. The ALJ issued a written decision denying Hill’s application on April 6, 2009. The Appeals Council denied Hill’s request for review, thereby making the ALJ’s decision the final decision subject to judicial review. Hill then filed a complaint with the district court. The district court adopted the findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.