Gabriel Fuentes-Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
475 F. App'x 238
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 13, 201210-72384California231 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Gabriel Alejandro Fuentes-Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applications for cancellation of removal and voluntary departure. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, and review de novo questions of law, including due process claims. Ibarra-Flores v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 614, 618 (9th Cir.2006). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Fuentes-Rodriguez did not meet the continuous physical presence requirement for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(A). In addition, he was ineligible for voluntary departure due to his previous grant. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229c.

The BIA did not err in concluding that Fuentes-Rodriguez did not establish a due process violation by the IJ. Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000).

We lack jurisdiction to review Fuentes-Rodriguez’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim because he failed to raise it before the agency. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.