Frederic Mazariegos Santos v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
475 F. App'x 675
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 14, 201210-71968California279 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Frederic Mazariegos Santos, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Mazariegos Santos’s motion to reopen as untimely where he filed the motion more than seven years after his final order of removal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(2) (motion to reopen must be filed within 90 days of final order), and failed to show the due diligence required to obtain equitable tolling of the filing deadline, see Iturribarria, 321 F.3d at 897 (equitable tolling is available where petitioner demonstrates due diligence in discovering the deception, fraud, or error that prevented timely filing).

Because the BIA’s untimeliness determination is dispositive, we do not reach Ma-zariegos Santos’s contentions concerning the departure bar and the merits of his ineffective assistance and due process…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.