Guillermo Castaneda v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
476 F. App'x 144
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 16, 201210-72420California297 words

Opinion

Opinion

Berzon, J.

MEMORANDUM

Guillermo Castaneda and his family, natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Zamanov v. Holder, 649 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir.2011), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on the discrepancies between Castaneda’s declaration and his testimony regarding whether or not he was attacked in 1984 and the number of threatening notes he received, and based on the omission from his declaration of receiving a death threat in Tiquisate. See id. (“Material alterations in the applicant’s account of persecution are sufficient to support an adverse credibility finding.”). The agency reasonably rejected Castaneda’s explanations. See Rivera v. Mukasey, 508 F.3d 1271, 1275 (9th Cir.2007). Accordingly, in the absence of credible testimony, Castaneda’s asylum and withholding of removal claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.