Css

MEMORANDUM

Gustavo Guzman appeals pro se the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

We review a district court’s judgment upholding the denial of social security benefits de novo, Tommasetti v. Astrue, 533 F.3d 1035, 1038 (9th Cir.2008), and reverse only if the ALJ’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole or if the ALJ applied the wrong legal standard. Molina v. Astrue, 674 F.3d 1104, 1110 (9th Cir.2012)

Guzman challenges the ALJ’s determination that he retained the residual functional capacity to perform the full range of medium work diming the time covered by his claim. The ALJ considered all the evidence relevant to Guzman’s functional limitations, including objective medical evidence, the opinions of medical sources, and Guzman’s statements. See Robbins v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 466 F.3d 880, 883 (9th Cir. 2006) (in determining a claimant’s RFC, an ALJ must consider all the relevant evidence in the case record). Guzman fails to identify relevant…