Michael Currie v. Beatrice Keller Clinic Pc

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 201211-15598California813 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FILED

AUG 22 2012

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL CURRIE, No. 11-15598

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:09-cv-01466-ROS v.

MEMORANDUM *

BEATRICE KELLER CLINIC,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Roslyn O. Silver, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 20, 2012 San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and VANCE, Chief District Judge.**

Michael Currie appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment on

his claim that the Beatrice Keller Clinic violated the Americans with Disabilities

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The Honorable Sarah S. Vance, Chief District Judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation. Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12112, by refusing to hire him after he failed a drug test.

We have jurisdiction to review the order under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

First, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.