Jerry Hamilton v. Maurice Junious
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 201209-17600California733 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 29 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
JERRY FRED HAMILTON, No. 09-17600
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:09-CV-01411-MCE-
CMK
v. Eastern District of California, Sacramento
MAURICE JUNIOUS,
Respondent - Appellee. ORDER AMENDING
MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION
AND DENYING PETITION FOR
REHEARING EN BANC
Before: D.W. NELSON, RAWLINSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The Memorandum Disposition filed on June 15, 2012, is AMENDED as
follows:
On page 2 of the Memorandum Disposition, the word “summary,” which
modified the California Court of Appeal’s dismissal of Hamilton’s petition, is
deleted. The modified sentenced now reads: “The California Court of Appeal’s
dismissal of the petition with citations to In re Steele, 32 Cal. 4th 682, 692 (2004)
and In re Steele, 32 Cal. 4th 682, 692 (2004) and In re Hillery, 202 Cal. App. 2d.
293 (1962) did not undo the superior court’s determination that Hamilton’s petition
was untimely. An amended Memorandum…