Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. Blank

Good Law
693 F.3d 1084·2012 WL 3892940·2013 A.M.C. 1157·42 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20186·75 ERC (BNA) 2014
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 10, 201211-17108California9,243 words

Opinion

Opinion

Callahan, J.

In 2011, the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) and the Pacific Fishery Management Council (“Pacific Council” or “Council”) adopted changes to the fishery management plan for the trawl sector of the Pacific Coast groundfish fishery. The changes, adopted as Amendments 20 and 21 to the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan, are designed to increase economic efficiency through fleet consolidation, reduce environmental impacts, and simplify future decisionmaking.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, et al. (“plaintiffs”) are a collection of primarily non-trawl fishermen’s associations and groups whose longtime participation in the fishery may shrink under Amendments 20 and 21. They argue that the Amendments are unlawful under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (“MSA”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1884 , which imposes procedural and substantive requirements for managing fisheries, and the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321-4347 , which imposes purely procedural requirements for reviewing the potential environmental effects of proposed agency actions.

The district court, which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.