United States v. Jennifer Shanholtzer

Good Law
492 F. App'x 798
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 12, 201211-30035California301 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Jennifer Shanholtzer (“Shanholtzer”) pled guilty to structuring financial transactions in violation of 31 U.S.C. § 5324 (a)(3). Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 5317 (c), the district court ordered forfeiture of the currency involved in the offense, as well as Shanholtzer’s interest in an aircraft purchased with such funds, and the truck she used to drive to various bank branches to make the deposits. Shanholtzer contests only the forfeiture of her truck. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

Section 5317 authorizes the forfeiture of all property “involved in” the offense. Shanholtzer argues that the vehicle lacks the “requisite nexus” to the crime, Fed. R.Crim.P. 32.2(b)(1)(A), and was a mere “means of locomotion” to the scene of a crime. Cf. Howard v. United States, 423 F.2d 1102, 1103-04 (9th Cir.1970). But Shanholtzer did not only drive the truck to a single bank and complete the crime there; rather, she also used the truck to transport currency that was withdrawn from a safety deposit box in Seward to deposit it in a branch in Anchorage. The truck thus facilitated the crime and also assisted in her attempt to avoid detection by making deposits at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.