Blas Castillo-Tapia v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 201210-73313California267 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 17 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BLAS CASTILLO-TAPIA; et al., No. 10-73313

Petitioners, Agency Nos. A075-709-088

A075-709-089

v. A075-709-090

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM *

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 10, 2012 **

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Blas Castillo-Tapia, Maria Del Carmen Lopez, and Eymard Roman Castillo

petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

denying their motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.