Amer Shalabi v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
482 F. App'x 286
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 201209-71351California388 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Amer M. A1 Shalabi, a native and citizen of Jordan, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006), and we review de novo due process claims; Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Shalabi testified that a neighbor threatened to kill him, that he was once jailed by police for two days, and that he suffers anxiety in Jordan. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of Shalabi’s asylum and withholding of removal claims because he failed to demonstrate he was or will be harmed on account of a protected ground. See Ochoa v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 1166, 1172 (9th Cir.2005); see also Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir.2009) (“[t]he Real ID Act requires that a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.