United States v. Juan Valdez-Robles
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 19, 201211-10395California240 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 19 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10395
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:10-cr-01595-RCC
v.
MEMORANDUM *
JUAN PEDRO VALDEZ-ROBLES, a.k.a. Jose Luis Ortiz-Hernandez,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 10, 2012 **
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Juan Pedro Valdez-Robles appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed
following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after deportation, in violation of
8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Valdez-Robles’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for…