United States v. Juan Valdez-Robles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 19, 201211-10395California240 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10395

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:10-cr-01595-RCC

v.

MEMORANDUM *

JUAN PEDRO VALDEZ-ROBLES, a.k.a. Jose Luis Ortiz-Hernandez,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2012 **

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Juan Pedro Valdez-Robles appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after deportation, in violation of

8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Valdez-Robles’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.