United States v. Perfecto Flores-Rosas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 19, 201211-10226California231 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10226

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00799-JAT

v.

MEMORANDUM *

PERFECTO FLORES-ROSAS, a.k.a. Javier Dominguez-Flores,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2012 **

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Perfecto Flores-Rosas appeals from the revocation of his supervised release

and the 10-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Flores-Rosas’s counsel has filed a brief stating

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

record. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.