FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10226

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00799-JAT

v.

MEMORANDUM *

PERFECTO FLORES-ROSAS, a.k.a. Javier Dominguez-Flores,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2012 **

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Perfecto Flores-Rosas appeals from the revocation of his supervised release

and the 10-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Flores-Rosas’s counsel has filed a brief stating

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

record. We have provided Flores-Rosas the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 11-10226