United States v. Fernando Ramirez-Mendoza

Good Law
479 F. App'x 802
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 201211-50251California239 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Fernando Ramirez-Mendoza appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 12-month and 1-day sentence for being an illegal alien in possession of firearms, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(5)(A). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1896 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ramirez-Mendoza’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Ramirez-Mendoza the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Ramirez-Mendoza waived his right to appeal his conviction, with the exception of an appeal based on a claim that his plea was involuntary. He also waived the right to appeal five specified issues related to his sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to Ramirez-Mendoza’s plea or any sentencing issue outside the scope of the appeal waiver. We therefore affirm as to those issues. We dismiss the remainder of the appeal in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.