United States v. Heidi Welch

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 201211-10581California246 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 20 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10581

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-50074-FJM

v.

MEMORANDUM *

HEIDI WELCH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Frederick J. Martone, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2012 **

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Heidi Welch appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the five-

month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), Welch’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for

relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Welch with the opportunity to file a pro se…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.