United States v. Heidi Welch
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 201211-10581California246 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 20 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10581
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-50074-FJM
v.
MEMORANDUM *
HEIDI WELCH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Frederick J. Martone, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 10, 2012 **
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Heidi Welch appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the five-
month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), Welch’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for
relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Welch with the opportunity to file a pro se…