Ramon Mendoza Lopez v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
481 F. App'x 375
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 24, 201211-71015California316 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Ramon Mendoza Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for relief from removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for substantial evidence the agency’s determination regarding good moral character, Ramos v. INS, 246 F.3d 1264, 1266 (9th Cir.2001), we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Mendoza Lopez is statutorily barred from establishing the good moral character required to qualify for cancellation of removal and voluntary departure because he voluntarily gave false testimony under oath at his asylum interview in 2007 with the subjective intent to obtain an immigration benefit. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 (f)(6), 1229b(b)(1)(B), 1229c(b)(1)(B); Castillo-Cruz v. Holder, 581 F.3d 1154, 1162 (9th Cir.2009) (holding that the period for demonstrating good moral character “is calculated backwards from the date on which the ... application is finally resolved by the IJ or the BIA”); Ramos, 246 F.3d at 1266 (concluding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.