Fausto Cettolin, Jr. v. Gmac Mortgage LLC

MEMORANDUM

Fausto U. Cettolin, Jr. and Donna L. Cettolin appeal pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing their action arising from foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo. Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1040 (9th Cir.2011). We affirm in part and dismiss in part.

The district court properly dismissed the Cettolins’ state law claims because the Cettolins failed to obtain injunctive relief before the trustee’s sale of the property. See Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 33-811(0 (trustor’s defenses and objections to a trustee’s sale are waived if they are not raised in an action resulting in injunctive relief before the sale); BT Capital, LLC v. TD Serv. Co. of Ariz., 229 Ariz. 299 , 275 P.3d 598, 600 (2012) (en banc) (“Where ... a trustee’s sale is completed, a person subject to § 33-811(0 cannot later challenge the sale based on pre-sale defenses or objections.”). Moreover, the Cettolins’ “show the note” argument is unpersuasive. See Hogan v. Washington Mut. Bank, N.A., — Ariz. -, 277 P.3d 781, 782 (2012) (en banc) (“Arizona’s non-judicial foreclosure statutes do not require the beneficiary to prove its…