Manuel De Jesus Ortega Melendr v. Joseph M. Arpaio

Bad Law
695 F.3d 990·2012 WL 4358727·2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 20120
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 25, 201212-15098California4,795 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wallace, J.

Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio and the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office (collectively, the Defendants) appeal from the district court’s December 23, 2011 order (Order), which granted Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, David and Jessica Rodriguez, Manuel Nieto, Jr., Velia Meraz, the organization Somos America, and the class of individuals the named plaintiffs represent (collectively, the Plaintiffs) “partial injunctive relief’ prohibiting the Defendants from detaining any individual “based only on knowledge or reasonable belief, without more, that the person is unlawfully present within the United States.” We have jurisdiction to review the district court’s order under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1), and we affirm.

I.

The Plaintiffs contend that the Defendants have a “custom, policy and practice of racial profiling toward Latino persons in Maricopa County and an unconstitutional policy and practice of stopping Latino drivers and passengers pretextually and without individualized suspicion or cause, and of subjecting them to different, burdensome, stigmatizing and injurious treatment once stopped,” under the auspices of enforcing federal immigration laws and/or Arizona state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.