United States v. Julio Valenzuela-Espinoza

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 4, 201210-10060California5,389 words

Opinion

Opinion

B. Fletcher, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 10-10060 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 4:08-cr-00431-

JULIO ALFONSO VALENZUELA- CKJ-HCE-

ESPINOZA,

Defendant-Appellant.  ORDER

AMENDING

OPINION AND

DENYING

REHEARING AND

AMENDED

 OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 11, 2011—San Francisco, California

Filed December 28, 2011 Amended October 4, 2012

Before: Betty B. Fletcher, Stephen Reinhardt, and A. Wallace Tashima, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge B. Fletcher

12037 12040 UNITED STATES v. VALENZUELA-ESPINOZA

COUNSEL

Francisco Leon, Tucson, Arizona, for appellant Julio Alfonso Valenzuela-Espinoza.

Dennis K. Burke, United States Attorney; Christina M. Cabanillas, appellate Chief; and Bruce M. Ferg, Assistant United States Attorney, Tucson, Arizona, for appellee United States of America.

ORDER

This court’s opinion, filed December 28, 2011, is amended by striking the words “United States v.” before…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.