Amanda Sateriale v. R J Reynolds Tobacco Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 15, 201211-55057California7,929 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fisher, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMANDA SATERIALE; JEFFREY  No. 11-55057 FEINMAN; PAMELA BURNS; DONALD D.C. No. WILSON; PATRICK GRIFFITHS; JACKIE 2:09-cv-08394-

WARREN; HEATHER POLESE; CAS-SS

RICHARD HOLTER; DAN POLESE;

FRED JAVAHERI, Individually and ORDER on Behalf of All Others Similarly AMENDING Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,  OPINION AND

DENYING

PETITION FOR

v. REHEARING AND

R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, PETITION FOR

Defendant-Appellee. REHEARING EN

BANC AND

AMENDED

 OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 7, 2012—Pasadena, California

Filed July 13, 2012 Amended October 15, 2012

12285 12286 SATERIALE v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO. Before: John T. Noonan, Jr., and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges, and Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge.*

Opinion by Judge Fisher

*The Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller, United States District Judge for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.