Amanda Sateriale v. R J Reynolds Tobacco Company
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 15, 201211-55057California7,929 words
Opinion
Opinion
Fisher, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AMANDA SATERIALE; JEFFREY No. 11-55057 FEINMAN; PAMELA BURNS; DONALD D.C. No. WILSON; PATRICK GRIFFITHS; JACKIE 2:09-cv-08394-
WARREN; HEATHER POLESE; CAS-SS
RICHARD HOLTER; DAN POLESE;
FRED JAVAHERI, Individually and ORDER on Behalf of All Others Similarly AMENDING Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, OPINION AND
DENYING
PETITION FOR
v. REHEARING AND
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, PETITION FOR
Defendant-Appellee. REHEARING EN
BANC AND
AMENDED
OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 7, 2012—Pasadena, California
Filed July 13, 2012 Amended October 15, 2012
12285 12286 SATERIALE v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO. Before: John T. Noonan, Jr., and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges, and Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge.*
Opinion by Judge Fisher
*The Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller, United States District Judge for the…