United States v. Eduardo Corral

Good Law
485 F. App'x 898
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 16, 201211-50395California265 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Eduardo Corral appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 135-month sentence for distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and (b)(1)(C), and transfer of a machine gun, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (o )(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Corral’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Corral filed a pro se brief and the government filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

Corral waived his right to appeal his conviction, with the exception of an appeal based on a claim that his plea was involuntary. He also waived the right to appeal five specified issues related to his sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to Corral’s plea or any sentencing issue outside the scope of the appeal waiver. We therefore affirm as to those issues. We dismiss the remainder of the appeal in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 988 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.