United States v. Alfonzo Rojas-Tena

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 16, 201210-30291California261 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 16 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-30291

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:09-cr-00154-BLW

v.

MEMORANDUM *

ALFONZO ROJAS-TENA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 9, 2012 **

Before: RAWLINSON, MURGUIA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Alfonzo Rojas-Tena appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month

sentence for conspiracy to distribute 50 grams or more of actual methamphetamine,

in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rojas-Tena’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no

grounds for relief, along with a motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.